Home
The Nul Pointers
Country Rankings
History By Country
History By Year
Forty Facts On ESC
Voting Tables
NP All Time Chart
News / Blog
Ones That Got Away
Love Thy Neighbour
Nul Points Store
Links
Superstars
The Worst Songs?
Congratulations!
Oj Oj Oj!
East Is East
Languages
Voting Changes
Roll Of Honour
Evolution
Medal Table
The UK At Eurovision
A Song For Europe
UK Chart
UK 50: The Vote
The Big Vote
Guestbook

 

 

East Is East
Tanel & Dave, Estonia TATU, Russia Marie N, Latvia

In 1956, Eurovision kicked off in Lugano with just 7 countries competing. As this meant a very short show, each country was allowed to enter 2 songs. A year later 3 more countries had joined the fold so we inaugurated the one-song-per-nation that we still enjoy today.  As the Sixties dawned so the number of participants increased to the mid-teens. This was still the Cold War era and the Eurovision Song Contest was essentially a Western Europe event.  It all came down to broadcasting politics. "Eurovision" was essentially an organization of Western European broadcasters. The communist countries had their own version called "Intervision".

As the 60s progressed the Intervision countries broadcast the contest without being able to enter. As the 70s dawned new (non-communist) countries were welcomed - Malta in 1971, Israel in 1973, Greece in 1974 and  Turkey in 1975. The 80s kicked off with a fleeting appearance by Morocco followed by debuts from Cyprus in 1982 and Iceland in 1986. As the decade ended big things were kicking-off in Eastern Europe.  Eurovision was suddenly an option for the Warsaw Pact countries. At the same time the break up of Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia & the USSR was creating new nations.

In 1992, Yugoslavia competed at Eurovision for the last time. There were 23 entrants in Malmo. The next year there was a slew of new countries gagging to enter. The EBU (the venerable European Broadcasting Union who run the contest) organized a pre-selection contest in Llubjana, Slovenia. 7 countries took part and the top 3 qualified for the main contest in Millstreet, Ireland. They just happened to all be ex-Yugoslavian states: Bosnia, Croatia & Slovenia.

At this point it was deemed that there were just too many new nations desperate to enter so drastic action was taken. The lowest scoring nations in 1993 would be relegated to make way for the 1994 debuts for the Eastern countries.  Hence 7 nations debuted in 1994: Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia & Slovakia. The last-placed relegation rule lasted 2 more years but there was a re-think for 1996. This year, every nation that wanted to compete submitted a song and there was a preselection by juries listening to audio tapes.  This resulted in the elimination of debutants Macedonia, and, much more controversially, Germany. This method was immediately scrapped :)

From 1997 the averages system came into play. The average points of the last 5 years was calculated and the worst countries were omitted from the next contest, with a proviso that they could return the next year.  However some countries were exempt. Just like in soccer, Eurovision has a hierarchy. France, Germany, Spain & United Kingdom pay lots of money to the EBU so it was deemed that they would always get automatic participation in Eurovision. In 2001 the rules changed again and we were back to the last-placed relegation again (with the safety-net for the Big-4 countries). This led to the relegation of Ireland (all conquering in the 1990s and 7 times winners).

For 2004 the EBU derived a system where everyone could come to the party. The contest final now has a fixed number of 24 countries.  Four places are reserved for the "Big 4" , and ten for the best scoring countries from the previous year.  All other interested entrants participate in a "semi-final" a few days before the contest, to fill the ten remaining places.

In 2006 37 countries selected a song for the semi and/or final.  That included four countries from former Yugoslavia and no less than eight from the former USSR.  Now neighbour voting has always been apparent throughout the history of the contest, witness the regular swapping of top marks between Greece and Cyprus, the UK's lavishing of points on Ireland and Scandinavian pulling together (most notoriously in 1966).  But in 2006 all 37 countries voted in the contest final whether they have qualified or not, and the overt neighbour voting of the "new" countries from the East is seriously threatening the credibility of the contest with broadcasters and viewers. Some have argued that this can be explained by similar tastes in music, but that argument is blown away when you hear the songs, which hardly ever sound ethnic to their country of origin. Some countries like Turkey, Russia and the ex-Yugoslavia have a head start of something like 50 points regardless of the quality of their song. That's not enough to win the contest, but can make the difference between making the final or making the top 10 for next year. 

Allied to this is the "diaspora" effect, where a sizeable immigrant population in another country will vote for their homeland. Again the countries of Eastern Europe have been the main beneficiaries.  This has been most exaggerated when the TV audience in the immigrant country has been low (eg. when that country is not participating in the final itself). In 2005 Austria was the first country to vote and the voting figures were low, they had not made the final : every single point Austria awarded from 1 to 12 points went to a country East or South of Vienna.  Additionally,

  • In 2004 the top five songs and seven of the top ten came from South-East Europe.

  • In 2005 the top seven songs came from South and East Europe.

  • The Big 4 countries of Spain, the UK, France and Germany finished in the bottom four places.   

  • In 2006 eight of the top ten songs came from east of Vienna.

  • In 2007 all ten semi-final qualifiers were.        

Some mooted solutions have been to limit voting to countries participating, to reduce the effect, or to revert to jury voting.  At present the EBU have shown no readiness to make a change, the revenue from all those phone calls is a strong incentive to retain the status quo (however they have, in 2008 split the semi-finals by seeding in an attempt to make the semis fairer). If viewing figures continue to slide some of the Western countries' broadcasters may well follow Austria in quitting the competition.